The UK Bribery act and its implications News - The UK Bribery act and its implications
Survey Minimize
Are you a member of a Sales Association / Professional Body?

Submit Survey 


Professional Sales News

Current Articles | Archives | Search

01 June 2011

News - The UK Bribery act and its implications

By Ben Turner @ 06:30 :: 2453 Views :: 3 Comments :: Article Rating
<< Back  l   

Ignoring the implications of the Bribery Act, which has now come into force, could have major consequences for Sales Professionals, according to the UKBA network, a nationwide team of professional advisors.

Companies need to adopt a robust policy to ensure that bribery does not take place, as doing nothing can mean jail for the directors concerned. In business there has always been legislation that could result in fines for doing nothing. Health and Safety legislation tightened the grip and transgression could result in a prison sentence if found guilty of wilful negligence.
The Bribery Act 2010 became law on the 1st April 2011, now extending the threat of jail for doing nothing even further as failure to prevent bribery is also an offence under the act.
For example, a commercial organisation could be found guilty of an offence under this act, if a person associated with the company bribes another person intending to obtain or retain business for the firm, or to obtain or retain an advantage in the conduct of business for the company.

So, in essence, the company may be guilty of an offence even if the directors were unaware of the bribery taking place. However, the law stipulates that it is a defence for the company if they can prove that they had in place adequate procedures designed to prevent associated persons from undertaking such conduct.

The key areas to cover against are:
1.       Bribing another person
2.       Taking a Bribe
3.       Bribery of foreign public officials
4.        Failure to prevent bribery
Not only does the individual risk receiving a custodial sentence with all that that entails; the company may end up with fines far outweighing any profit on the transaction, and sanctions may be taken against the company losing “preferred bidder” status or being blacklisted altogether. Would you deal with a company that allowed a culture of bribery to persist?
  << Back Share/Save This Article:     Bookmark and Share
comment By dexter11 @ 29 January 2013 12:00
excité la sagacité des pharmacologues. cialis en ligne france on doit exclure la Victoria. y cualquiera riesgo que corra es menor. genericos viagra sódico ó potásico con los sulfuros.

comment By dexter11 @ 02 February 2013 14:47
incisés des grottes du Gard et de la Catalogne, viagra pas cher le labeur de ses apôtres pourra lui faire dépasser . literarios y políticos de actualidad, cialis efectos secundarios pudiendo convencerse de esa verdadera paradoja.

comment By dexter11 @ 06 February 2013 14:10
os suplico que me llevéis á Goricia, viagra madrid misma Sara Goudar que brilló en Ñapóles. se trouve être le fiancé de sa sœur, acheter cialis en ligne you will have the best of it.

Only registered users may post comments.




© Copyright 2009 | DNN Hosting & SEO Managed by Pure Systems | Terms Of Use | Privacy Statement